H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Amanda Brown H2H: 0-1

Amanda Brown holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Brown leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Brown won the 1984 Birmingham round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Amanda Brown
GBR Age 61

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Brown 6-3 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Jun 13, 1984* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Amanda Brown — — — 1,653 48 55 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Amanda Brown
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1981 9–4 69.2% — 1,559 0 0
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1982 12–4 75.0% — 1,635 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 7–12 36.8% — 1,595 0 1
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1984 14–18 43.8% — 1,611 0 1
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1985 5–13 27.8% — 1,577 0 1
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,556 0 1
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Amanda Brown
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 0 2 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 13 15 28 46.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Amanda Brown
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1476 101.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.00 — — — -0.05
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1981 1560 119.3 — — — — — — — 66.7% +1.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.47
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1982 1635 123.4 — — — — — -58 — 73.5% +2.32 1–1 2–0 — +2.21
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1596 107.2 — — — — -21 — -2 38.1% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +0.68
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1984 1611 109.9 — — — — -60 -13 +27 44.6% -0.58 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 103.1 +1.65
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1985 1578 109.4 — — — — -9 — -25 29.3% -1.41 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.07
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1986 1556 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.31
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1654 115.8 — — — — -38 -36 +1 46.7% -0.16 12–13 (48%) 13–8 (62%) 102.5 +5.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.