H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Carrie Meyer H2H: 2-0

Kate Latham holds a 2–0 lead over Carrie Meyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1979 Tokyo Sillook round of 32 7-6 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Carrie Meyer
USA Age 71 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 7-6 3-6 6-4 Carrie Meyer Match data Sep 13, 1979* R32 Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Hard
Kate Latham 7-6(3) 6-3 Carrie Meyer Match data Jan 26, 1978* R32 Columbus WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Carrie Meyer — — — 1,945 83 99 45.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Carrie Meyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,522 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1974 22–11 66.7% — 1,749 0 1
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1975 16–17 48.5% — 1,865 0 1
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1976 15–16 48.4% — 1,821 0 1
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1977 8–23 25.8% — 1,645 0 1
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1978 13–12 52.0% — 1,727 0 2
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1979 7–13 35.0% — 1,728 0 2
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 1980 0–5 0.0% — 1,665 0 2
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Carrie Meyer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 2 3 33.3% 12 3 15 80.0% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — —
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1976 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 0 4 4 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 7 10 30.0%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 5 5 0.0%
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 18 22 40 45.0% 19 18 37 51.4% 13 16 29 44.8% 27 42 69 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Carrie Meyer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1972 1507 101.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.17
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1973 1523 107.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — — — +0.25
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1750 142.2 — — — — -157 +13 -61 64.4% +1.01 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.09
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1975 1866 147.5 — — — — -16 -105 — 47.9% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 1–6 (14%) 98.4 -1.48
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1976 1822 135.6 — — — — +30 -101 — 44.6% -0.50 9–3 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.6 -2.34
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1977 1645 124.7 — — — — +18 +28 -31 29.6% -1.39 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 96.6 -3.26
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 1978 1727 132.0 — — — — -46 -63 — 50.0% +0.43 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.5 -0.20
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1979 1728 139.5 — — — — -16 — — 37.8% -0.60 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 98.2 -1.29
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 1980 1665 104.1 — — — — -68 — — 9.1% -2.91 0–1 1–1 — -0.08
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1945 143.2 — — — — -10 -18 -51 45.4% -0.26 26–26 (50%) 10–21 (32%) 98.9 -4.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.