H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kate Latham vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 1-1
Kate Latham and Catarina Lindqvist Ryan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1984 Hershey third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1984* | Hershey | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-5 6-2 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1982* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kate Latham | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kate Latham | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |