H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Deborah Douglas in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1981 Berkeley round of 16 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | 7-5 6-1 | Deborah Douglas | Match data | May 3, 1981* | R16 | Berkeley | WTA 250 | — |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,864 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Deborah Douglas | — | — | — | 1,500 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kate Latham | Deborah Douglas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Kate Latham | Deborah Douglas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1969 | 1489 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.07 | 1980 | 1481 | 91.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 1970 | 1476 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.63 | — | — | — | +0.42 | 1981 | 1493 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | — | — | -0.24 |
| 1972 | 1503 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | 45.5% | -0.54 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 1587 | 129.0 | — | — | — | — | -41 | — | 0 | 48.3% | +0.14 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 1828 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | -65 | -181 | -31 | 68.9% | +1.55 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.0 | +3.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 1685 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -76 | — | 45.3% | -0.03 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–7 (13%) | 89.6 | -0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 1676 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | — | 57.1% | +1.00 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +2.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 1749 | 140.9 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -119 | — | 54.2% | +0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–1 (80%) | 103.9 | -0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 1661 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -10 | +69 | 43.3% | -0.58 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.3 | +2.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 1852 | 149.5 | — | — | — | — | -20 | -164 | -96 | 45.5% | -0.29 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.4 | -2.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 1749 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -30 | — | +16 | 51.5% | +0.05 | 5–10 (33%) | 7–4 (64%) | 96.7 | -1.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1774 | 142.7 | — | — | — | — | -17 | — | +6 | 52.1% | +0.14 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.1 | -1.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1685 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -102 | +34 | 44.5% | -0.56 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–2 (71%) | 106.2 | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1624 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -49 | +71 | 40.3% | -0.61 | 7–9 (44%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.8 | +0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1492 | 91.5 | — | — | — | — | +52 | +30 | — | 8.3% | -3.08 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1527 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.40 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1864 | 138.0 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -77 | -8 | 49.1% | -0.03 | 56–62 (47%) | 41–38 (52%) | 100.8 | +0.44 | Career | 1500 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | -4.33 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 10 | 10 | Mar 13, 1982 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 8 | 8 | Aug 13, 1983 | H2H |
| Sue Barker | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 12, 1983 | H2H |
| Dianne Fromholtz | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jan 21, 1982 | H2H |
| Pam Teeguarden | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 22, 1983 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 3, 1981 | H2H |
| Patty Mcquown | 1 | 0 | 1 | May 2, 1981 | H2H |
| Tina Mochizuki | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 3, 1980 | H2H |