H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Fiorella Bonicelli H2H: 0-2

Fiorella Bonicelli holds a 2–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fiorella Bonicelli leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Fiorella Bonicelli won the 1974 Wimbledon round of 64 2-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Fiorella Bonicelli
URU Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fiorella Bonicelli 2-6 7-5 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Jun 28, 1974* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Fiorella Bonicelli 7-6 6-7 7-6 Kate Latham Match data Aug 24, 1973* R16 Orange WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Fiorella Bonicelli — — — 1,868 137 98 58.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Fiorella Bonicelli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,509 0 0
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1969 11–8 57.9% — 1,604 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 11–5 68.8% — 1,702 0 2
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1971 12–10 54.5% — 1,701 0 6
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1972 26–16 61.9% — 1,796 0 9
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1973 24–11 68.6% — 1,842 0 11
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1974 6–4 60.0% — 1,800 0 11
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1975 12–13 48.0% — 1,774 0 12
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 1976 14–8 63.6% — 1,776 0 12
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 1977 9–10 47.4% — 1,763 0 12
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 1978 10–9 52.6% — 1,742 0 12
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,728 0 12
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 1984 1–1 50.0% — 1,717 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Fiorella Bonicelli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — —
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1973 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1974 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 — — — — 14 7 21 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1978 — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 3 4 7 42.9% 103 67 170 60.6% 23 26 49 46.9% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Fiorella Bonicelli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1968 1510 98.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.19
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1969 1604 117.2 — — — — — +35 -68 61.0% +0.41 0–3 (0%) — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1702 116.4 — — — — — +53 -159 61.8% +0.44 3–1 (75%) — — +1.28
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1971 1702 122.1 — — — — — +58 -185 54.9% +0.33 3–4 (43%) — — +2.08
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1972 1796 137.0 — — — — — +57 -166 58.0% +0.53 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 105.5 -0.59
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1973 1842 136.2 — — — — — +53 -147 63.0% +0.73 8–3 (73%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 +0.33
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 1974 1800 119.7 — — — — — +33 -78 66.7% +1.33 1–2 (33%) — — +0.49
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1975 1774 138.4 — — — — -137 +22 -84 51.7% +0.29 6–6 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.0 -2.39
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 1976 1777 132.4 — — — — — +29 — 59.2% +0.84 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 103.9 -0.37
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 1977 1763 128.8 — — — — — +1 -63 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.83
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 1978 1743 134.2 — — — — — +42 -82 55.8% +0.28 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.2 -1.32
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 1982 1728 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.22
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 1984 1717 101.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.67 1–1 — — +0.28
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1868 138.2 — — — — -137 +40 -127 57.4% +0.47 40–35 (53%) 18–14 (56%) 102.7 -0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.