H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Jeanne Evert H2H: 0-2

Jeanne Evert holds a 2–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeanne Evert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeanne Evert won the 1975 New York semifinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 74
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Jeanne Evert
USA 155 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeanne Evert 6-2 6-1 Kate Latham Match data Aug 6, 1975* SF New York WTA 250 Clay
Jeanne Evert 6-2 6-4 Kate Latham Match data Jul 20, 1975* F Annapolis WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Jeanne Evert — — — 1,884 120 90 57.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Jeanne Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1971 7–3 70.0% — 1,602 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1972 16–9 64.0% — 1,727 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1973 19–11 63.3% — 1,804 0 3
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1974 17–11 60.7% — 1,849 0 4
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1975 31–19 62.0% — 1,811 0 7
18 — — — — — — — 1976 9–12 42.9% — 1,732 0 7
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1977 13–12 52.0% — 1,750 0 7
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1978 8–13 38.1% — 1,635 0 7
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Jeanne Evert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 14 7 21 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 3 6 9 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1978 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 12 19 31 38.7% 72 45 117 61.5% 10 12 22 45.5% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Jeanne Evert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1602 121.0 — — — — — +40 — 65.2% +0.74 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +1.14
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1727 133.7 — — — — — +67 -174 64.0% +1.06 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +1.07
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1805 141.9 — — — — — +18 -198 62.1% +1.11 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 102.4 -0.17
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1974 1849 147.0 — — — — — +53 -213 59.3% +0.69 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 -3.66
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1975 1812 131.2 — — — — -202 +24 — 56.1% +0.34 12–6 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.1 +0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1733 119.2 — — — — -126 +25 -92 45.8% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.32
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61 1977 1751 122.0 — — — — -139 +21 -103 49.1% -0.46 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 103.8 -0.52
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1978 1635 99.7 — — — — -75 +99 — 35.4% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 103.5 +1.75
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31 — 1884 136.0 — — — — -133 +41 -158 54.6% +0.25 35–23 (60%) 16–10 (62%) 107.6 -0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.