H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Jill Davis H2H: 1-0

Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1982 San Diego round of 16 7-5 1-6 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 7-5 1-6 6-3 Jill Davis Match data Jul 30, 1982* R16 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Jill Davis 1,641 20 24 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kate Latham Jill Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1969 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% 1,502 0 0
1970 1–3 25.0% 1,475 0 0 1980 2–5 28.6% 1,484 0 0
1972 3–3 50.0% 1,502 0 0 1981 7–4 63.6% 1,549 0 0
1973 6–7 46.2% 1,587 0 0 1982 7–6 53.8% 1,627 0 0
1974 40–16 71.4% 1,828 0 3 1983 3–7 30.0% 1,614 0 0
1975 15–20 42.9% 1,684 0 3
1976 4–2 66.7% 1,676 0 3
1977 15–12 55.6% 1,748 0 3
1978 13–17 43.3% 1,660 0 3
1979 21–23 47.7% 1,852 0 3
1980 23–22 51.1% 1,748 0 4
1981 21–20 51.2% 1,774 0 5
1982 24–28 46.2% 1,684 0 5
1983 9–16 36.0% 1,623 0 6
1984 0–11 0.0% 1,492 0 6
1985 3–1 75.0% 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Kate Latham Jill Davis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1969 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 1 2 3 33.3%
1970 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
1973 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
1976 4 2 6 66.7%
1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% Career 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kate Latham Jill Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1969 1489 99.9 0.0% -2.50 -0.07 1979 1502 103.3 +56 33.3% -1.17 1–0 +0.14
1970 1476 93.6 +10 25.0% -2.63 +0.42 1980 1484 97.9 35.7% -0.43 1–1 0–2 +0.17
1972 1503 99.9 +39 45.5% -0.54 0–1 +0.62 1981 1549 114.9 65.2% +1.17 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.22
1973 1587 129.0 -41 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) -0.26 1982 1628 123.7 -10 +12 54.8% +0.26 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -0.05
1974 1828 140.0 -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1983 1614 114.2 -25 +35 36.4% -0.59 0–2 1–1 -0.64
1975 1685 132.9 +12 -76 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
1976 1676 107.6 +22 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 +2.30
1977 1749 140.9 -7 -119 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
1978 1661 118.3 +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
1979 1852 149.5 -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
1980 1749 133.1 -30 +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
1981 1774 142.7 -17 +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
1982 1685 128.0 +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
1983 1624 115.0 +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
1984 1492 91.5 +52 +30 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 +0.50
1985 1527 102.8 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 +0.05
Career 1864 138.0 -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 Career 1642 118.4 -15 +33 49.0% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.