H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-1

Laura Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1982 Tokyo Borden quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Arraya 6-4 6-4 Kate Latham Match data Oct 16, 1982* QF Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,712 0 7
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,759 0 8
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1981 1685 129.1 — — — — -70 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) — -1.24
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1742 126.9 — — — — -61 -27 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.71
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1983 1713 125.7 — — — — +8 +30 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.84
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1984 1760 130.6 — — — — -102 +141 -132 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.94
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) — +3.26 1985 1692 124.9 — — — — -2 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.84
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) — -0.75 1986 1718 138.1 — — — — -26 +100 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.79
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1987 1770 133.4 — — — — -31 -11 -184 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.60
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +2.03 1989 1883 136.8 — — — — -8 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.41
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) — -2.22 1990 1821 141.9 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.41
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.81 1991 1823 132.7 — — — — +13 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.96
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.96 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.62
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.31 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.