H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Kate Latham vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 3-1

Kate Latham holds a 3–1 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1984 Pittsburgh third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
Age 73
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
Age 65

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 26, 1984* Pittsburgh WTA 250 R32 Carpet Mareen Louie Harper 6-3 6-0 Kate Latham Match data
Aug 17, 1981 Toronto WTA 250 R64 Hard Kate Latham 6-4 3-6 6-2 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Jul 31, 1981* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Kate Latham 7-6 7-5 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
May 11, 1974* Portola Valley WTA 250 QF Hard Kate Latham 6-1 7-5 Mareen Louie Harper Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,866 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,476 0 0 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,567 0 0
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,503 0 0 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,715 0 0
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,844 0 3 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,690 0 3 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,670 0 0
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,680 0 3 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,755 0 3 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,661 0 3 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,848 0 3 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 2
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,614 0 2
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,577 0 2
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,688 0 5 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,591 0 2
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 6 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,615 0 2
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,494 0 6 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,546 0 2
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,528 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2