H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Mary Carillo H2H: 1-0

Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Carillo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1980 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mary Carillo
USA Age 69 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-3 6-4 Mary Carillo Match data Jan 10, 1980* R32 Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Mary Carillo — — — 1,774 47 45 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Mary Carillo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1974 1–1 50.0% — 1,503 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1976 3–2 60.0% — 1,549 0 0
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1977 17–16 51.5% — 1,687 0 1
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1978 1–3 25.0% — 1,651 0 1
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1979 24–13 64.9% — 1,773 0 3
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1980 1–8 11.1% — 1,681 0 3
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,675 0 3
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Mary Carillo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1979 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 3 4 7 42.9% 19 14 33 57.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Mary Carillo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1974 1503 102.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1493 99.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1976 1549 111.5 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.18 0–1 2–0 — -0.30
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1977 1687 139.8 — — — — -75 -32 -137 55.1% +0.23 3–9 (25%) 5–2 (71%) 98.7 +0.45
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1978 1652 99.9 — — — — -50 — — 33.3% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.68
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 1979 1774 136.1 — — — — -99 -43 -147 62.7% +0.83 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 +1.78
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1980 1681 104.4 — — — — -107 — -107 20.0% -2.00 0–2 1–1 — -1.00
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 1982 1676 108.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.51
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1774 134.3 — — — — -85 -26 -135 53.4% +0.13 8–16 (33%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.