H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 1-3

Regina Marsikova holds a 3–1 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Regina Marsikova leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1980 Phoenix round of 16 4-6 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 74
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Regina Marsikova
CZE Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Regina Marsikova 4-6 6-4 7-6 Kate Latham Match data Oct 10, 1980* R16 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Regina Marsikova 6-1 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Aug 9, 1979* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Regina Marsikova 4-6 6-1 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Aug 28, 1977* QF Charlotte WTA 250 Clay
Kate Latham 6-2 6-1 Regina Marsikova Match data Feb 17, 1977* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Regina Marsikova — — — 2,036 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Regina Marsikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1975 5–5 50.0% — 1,581 0 0
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1976 17–15 53.1% — 1,748 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1977 37–17 68.5% — 1,907 0 8
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1978 56–30 65.1% — 1,953 0 12
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1979 38–24 61.3% — 1,938 0 12
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1980 33–22 60.0% — 1,902 0 14
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1981 34–16 68.0% — 1,998 0 15
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3 1985 12–16 42.9% — 1,764 0 15
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4 1986 15–19 44.1% — 1,720 0 15
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5 1987 14–19 42.4% — 1,672 0 15
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,605 0 15
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6 1989 1–6 14.3% — 1,541 0 15
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Regina Marsikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3%
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Regina Marsikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1500 116.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.30
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1975 1582 125.6 — — — — +75 +3 — 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — 0.00
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1976 1748 142.5 — — — — -178 +62 -175 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.71
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1908 143.3 — — — — -346 +115 -246 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.7 +0.40
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61 1978 1953 158.0 — — — — -97 +117 -135 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.6 -6.67
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1979 1938 147.7 — — — — -80 +153 -92 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.57
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17 1980 1902 147.9 — — — — -21 +194 — 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.24
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71 1981 1999 159.4 — — — — -116 +183 — 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -5.46
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28 1985 1765 131.6 — — — — +5 +293 -79 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.24
27 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93 1986 1720 127.0 — — — — +3 +191 — 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.14
28 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97 1987 1673 129.0 — — — — +35 +91 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.64
29 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20 1988 1606 99.5 — — — — — +86 — 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.61
30 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86 1989 1541 97.0 — — — — — +71 — 14.3% -2.21 — 0–1 — +0.26
31 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31 — 2036 150.6 — — — — -67 +139 -142 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.