H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Sandy Collins H2H: 2-2

Kate Latham and Sandy Collins are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet. Most recently, Sandy Collins won the 1984 Dallas round of 32 4-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Sandy Collins
USA Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandy Collins 4-6 6-2 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Mar 22, 1984* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Sandy Collins 6-2 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Sep 17, 1982* R16 Tokyo Tv Open WTA 250 Carpet
Kate Latham 7-6 6-2 Sandy Collins Match data Mar 11, 1982* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Kate Latham 6-1 6-1 Sandy Collins Match data Feb 25, 1982* R32 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Sandy Collins — — — 1,823 89 151 37.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Sandy Collins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1978 6–6 50.0% — 1,536 0 0
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1979 2–7 22.2% — 1,495 0 0
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1980 10–12 45.5% — 1,630 0 0
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1981 25–20 55.6% — 1,785 0 0
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1982 14–21 40.0% — 1,733 0 0
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 1983 13–20 39.4% — 1,684 0 0
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 1984 9–18 33.3% — 1,599 0 0
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 1985 1–9 10.0% — 1,507 0 0
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,453 0 0
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 1988 3–5 37.5% — 1,490 0 0
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 1989 2–8 20.0% — 1,472 0 0
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 1990 1–9 10.0% — 1,421 0 0
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 1991 1–5 16.7% — 1,405 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1992 1–2 33.3% — 1,412 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,407 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,393 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Sandy Collins
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1981 4 5 9 44.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 12 19 36.8%
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1984 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1989 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 33 55 88 37.5% 20 32 52 38.5% 6 24 30 20.0% 26 38 64 40.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Sandy Collins
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1497 99.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.62
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1978 1537 117.1 — — — — +89 — — 57.1% +0.64 0–4 (0%) — — +0.85
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1979 1495 107.9 — — — — — -5 — 30.0% -0.55 0–2 0–1 — +1.38
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1980 1631 128.8 — — — — +4 — — 48.9% +0.22 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.6 +0.03
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 1981 1786 137.9 — — — — -48 -81 -187 52.6% -0.04 6–3 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 104.5 -1.75
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1982 1733 126.3 — — — — -17 -43 — 38.7% -0.91 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 103.2 -0.59
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 1983 1684 124.1 — — — — +35 -29 -111 40.8% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 95.5 -0.13
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 1984 1600 117.7 — — — — +113 -7 -91 34.4% -0.97 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 -0.20
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 1985 1508 99.2 — — — — +101 — — 18.2% -2.36 0–2 1–0 — +0.70
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 1986 1500 101.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.02
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 1987 1453 94.2 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.56 0–1 — — +0.23
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 1988 1491 114.4 — — — — +84 — — 42.1% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.02
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 1989 1473 103.4 — — — — +55 — — 23.8% -1.71 0–1 2–0 — +0.37
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 1990 1421 95.6 — — — — +39 +113 — 17.4% -2.65 1–2 (33%) — — +0.17
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 1991 1406 104.6 — — — — +39 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1413 104.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.18
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1407 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.07
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1393 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–2 1–1 — -0.05
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1823 125.8 — — — — +27 -35 -127 39.2% -0.76 24–34 (41%) 15–24 (38%) 92.7 +0.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.