H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 2-1

Kate Latham holds a 2–1 lead over Stacy Margolin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kate Latham leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1982 Manchester semifinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Stacy Margolin
USA Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-4 6-3 Stacy Margolin Match data Jun 5, 1982* SF Manchester WTA 250 Grass
Stacy Margolin 6-4 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Jul 31, 1980* R32 San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Kate Latham 7-6 6-2 Stacy Margolin Match data Mar 17, 1977* R32 Philadelphia WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Stacy Margolin — — — 1,854 73 99 42.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Stacy Margolin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1977 1–5 16.7% — 1,504 0 2
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1978 16–5 76.2% — 1,781 0 4
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1979 12–20 37.5% — 1,753 0 4
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1980 25–26 49.0% — 1,774 0 4
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1981 11–20 35.5% — 1,696 0 4
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,541 0 4
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 1983 2–5 28.6% — 1,518 0 4
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,512 0 4
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 1985 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 4
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Stacy Margolin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1980 14 7 21 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 14 23 39.1%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1981 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 9 13 30.8%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 5 5 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 32 34 66 48.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 6 13 19 31.6% 25 36 61 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Stacy Margolin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1976 1524 94.1 — — — — +93 — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.93
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1505 107.1 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.64
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1978 1781 145.4 — — — — -10 — — 68.8% +1.56 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — +0.02
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1979 1753 143.1 — — — — -3 -222 -184 42.5% -0.05 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 -0.85
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1980 1775 142.4 — — — — -13 — -189 48.6% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 101.2 -1.56
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 1981 1696 121.6 — — — — +33 -201 — 40.3% -1.19 3–7 (30%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 +0.05
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1982 1542 96.6 — — — — +49 -85 +26 27.9% -1.70 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.55
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 1983 1519 103.3 — — — — +70 — +32 37.5% -0.81 0–2 0–1 — +0.45
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 1984 1512 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.14
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 1985 1480 92.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.25
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1855 135.3 — — — — +9 -148 -86 44.5% -0.36 16–30 (35%) 11–19 (37%) 92.2 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.