H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kate Latham vs Steffi Graf H2H: 1-0
Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Steffi Graf in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1983 Salt Lake City fourth round 7-5 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1983* | Salt Lake City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kate Latham | 7-5 6-7 6-4 | Steffi Graf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Steffi Graf | #3 | #1 | 5,028 | 2,600 | 866 | 109 | 88.8% | 22 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 50 | 106 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kate Latham | Steffi Graf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #22 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,037 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 63–6 | 91.3% | #3 | 2,329 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 70–2 | 97.2% | #1 | 2,505 | 1 | 19 |
| 19 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 68–3 | 95.8% | #1 | 2,535 | 5 | 29 |
| 20 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 85–2 | 97.7% | #1 | 2,584 | 8 | 43 |
| 21 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,510 | 9 | 53 |
| 22 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,418 | 10 | 60 |
| 23 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 61–6 | 91.0% | #2 | 2,448 | 11 | 68 |
| 24 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 77–5 | 93.9% | #1 | 2,510 | 14 | 78 |
| 25 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #1 | 2,417 | 15 | 85 |
| 26 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 48–2 | 96.0% | #1 | 2,466 | 18 | 94 |
| 27 | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 51–4 | 92.7% | #1 | 2,446 | 21 | 101 |
| 28 | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 16–4 | 80.0% | #28 | 2,353 | 21 | 102 |
| 29 | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #9 | 2,284 | 21 | 105 |
| 30 | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #3 | 2,242 | 22 | 106 |
| 31 | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |