H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 1-0

Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Stephanie Rehe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1983 Perugia round of 64 2-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Rehe
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 2-2 (ret.) Stephanie Rehe Match data May 4, 1983* R64 Perugia WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Stephanie Rehe #156 #10 60 2,005 134 98 57.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Stephanie Rehe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
11 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1983 0–4 0.0% — 1,472 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1984 1–5 16.7% #182 1,461 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1985 23–12 65.7% #18 1,805 0 2
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1986 25–16 61.0% #19 1,823 0 2
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1987 17–8 68.0% #28 1,868 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 1988 43–19 69.4% #14 1,970 0 5
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1990 7–6 53.8% #58 1,972 0 5
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1991 5–12 29.4% #123 1,768 0 5
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1992 9–13 40.9% #74 1,746 0 5
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1993 3–2 60.0% #156 1,759 0 5
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Stephanie Rehe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 15 8 23 65.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 10 3 13 76.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 33 14 47 70.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 89 52 141 63.1% 12 17 29 41.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 28 21 49 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Stephanie Rehe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1502 97.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — — — 0.00
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1472 101.2 — — — — — +53 — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–2 — -0.11
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1461 107.5 — — — — +98 — — 33.3% -1.27 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1805 137.6 — — — — +30 — -204 66.2% +1.22 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 +1.03
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1986 1824 143.8 — — — — +5 -244 — 59.8% +0.59 9–8 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 99.5 -0.44
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1987 1868 140.6 — — — — +24 -213 — 66.7% +0.83 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 107.0 -1.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1971 150.3 — — — — +36 -321 -361 63.4% +0.84 16–4 (80%) 9–7 (56%) 109.5 +1.45
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1990 1972 150.4 — — — — +13 — — 48.4% -0.35 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -2.64
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1991 1768 119.9 — — — — +127 -164 -189 37.5% -0.45 1–5 (17%) 1–7 (13%) 88.2 +0.02
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 1992 1746 139.7 — — — — +45 — — 44.0% -0.42 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.1 -2.65
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1993 1759 118.2 — — — — +25 — — 70.0% +2.00 1–1 — — -0.09
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 2005 148.4 — — — — +33 -192 -247 57.2% +0.47 39–35 (53%) 27–34 (44%) 96.6 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.