H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Terry Holladay H2H: 1-3

Terry Holladay holds a 3–1 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Terry Holladay leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kate Latham leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Terry Holladay won the 1980 Seattle round of 32 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Terry Holladay
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Terry Holladay 6-0 6-1 Kate Latham Match data Jan 31, 1980* R32 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet
Terry Holladay 6-2 2-6 7-5 Kate Latham Match data Jan 26, 1979* R16 Hollywood WTA 250 Hard
Terry Holladay 6-4 7-5 Kate Latham Match data Jun 28, 1978* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Kate Latham 6-3 6-7 6-1 Terry Holladay Match data Aug 26, 1977* R32 Charlotte WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Terry Holladay #395 #39 7 1,942 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Terry Holladay
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,473 0 0
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1973 4–2 66.7% — 1,507 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1974 12–17 41.4% — 1,563 0 0
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1975 32–23 58.2% — 1,758 0 0
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1976 28–20 58.3% — 1,880 0 1
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1977 15–15 50.0% — 1,935 0 1
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1978 2–8 20.0% — 1,860 0 1
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1979 17–18 48.6% — 1,829 0 1
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 1980 25–21 54.3% — 1,825 0 1
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,672 0 1
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,638 0 1
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 1983 9–8 52.9% — 1,678 0 1
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 1984 15–16 48.4% #50 1,676 0 1
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,608 0 1
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 1986 5–8 38.5% #103 1,627 0 1
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 1987 0–9 0.0% #315 1,511 0 1
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Terry Holladay
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 9 23 60.9%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 9 14 35.7%
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 12 23 47.8%
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 64 69 133 48.1% 23 27 50 46.0% 42 39 81 51.9% 50 64 114 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Terry Holladay
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1489 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1972 1473 99.7 — — — — +72 — — 45.5% -0.27 0–1 0–1 — +1.13
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1973 1507 105.7 — — — — +97 — — 66.7% +1.08 — 1–0 — +1.72
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1564 120.1 — — — — -36 +43 — 44.6% -0.46 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +1.00
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1975 1759 130.6 — — — — -20 -115 -113 57.1% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 +3.05
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1976 1881 145.1 — — — — +18 -233 -149 59.2% +0.31 4–4 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -2.82
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1977 1935 148.1 — — — — -11 — -129 51.5% +0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -5.13
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 1978 1860 129.1 — — — — -14 — -55 37.5% -0.92 1–5 (17%) 1–3 (25%) 94.1 -1.83
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1979 1830 140.2 — — — — -3 — — 49.3% +0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.65
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 1980 1825 148.0 — — — — +8 — -5 52.0% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -3.22
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 1981 1672 108.6 — — — — +73 — +82 30.3% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.08
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 1982 1638 94.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 1983 1679 131.8 — — — — +14 — +103 57.1% +0.28 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.24
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 1984 1677 119.7 — — — — +9 — +71 46.8% -0.44 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 100.8 +1.76
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 1985 1608 118.7 — — — — +24 — +88 40.7% -0.75 4–5 (44%) 1–5 (17%) 98.1 +0.50
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 1986 1628 114.8 — — — — -6 — +92 40.7% -0.70 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 +0.25
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 1987 1511 88.0 — — — — +46 — +95 5.3% -3.53 0–1 0–1 — +0.19
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1943 138.0 — — — — +8 -60 -15 48.8% -0.14 51–55 (48%) 33–39 (46%) 98.9 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.