H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kate Latham vs Vicki Nelson H2H: 1-1
Kate Latham and Vicki Nelson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Vicki Nelson leads 1–0 on clay, while Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vicki Nelson won the 1984 Miami third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1984* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Vicki Nelson | 6-1 6-4 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1983* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Kate Latham | 1-6 6-3 6-0 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kate Latham | Vicki Nelson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |