H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Zenda Liess H2H: 3-1

Kate Latham holds a 3–1 lead over Zenda Liess in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kate Latham leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1980 Phoenix round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Zenda Liess
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-2 6-2 Zenda Liess Match data Oct 9, 1980* R32 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Zenda Liess 6-3 3-6 7-6 Kate Latham Match data Aug 18, 1978* R16 Canadian Open WTA 250 Hard
Kate Latham 4-6 6-1 6-1 Zenda Liess Match data Aug 11, 1978* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Kate Latham 6-1 6-3 Zenda Liess Match data Feb 2, 1978* R32 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Zenda Liess — — — 1,743 42 61 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Zenda Liess
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1974 7–7 50.0% — 1,554 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,573 0 0
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1976 7–4 63.6% — 1,668 0 0
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1977 4–13 23.5% — 1,619 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 16–17 48.5% — 1,742 0 0
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1979 3–11 21.4% — 1,662 0 0
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1980 1–4 20.0% — 1,610 0 0
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Zenda Liess
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 6 6 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1980 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 9 19 28 32.1% 23 24 47 48.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 13 18 27.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Zenda Liess
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1554 119.5 — — — — — -29 — 50.0% +0.32 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.30
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1574 114.9 — — — — — +15 — 47.8% -0.09 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.13
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1976 1669 124.1 — — — — — +28 — 59.1% +1.09 1–1 — — +0.18
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1977 1619 124.4 — — — — -92 +63 — 30.6% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 -0.82
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1743 135.7 — — — — -78 -37 — 50.0% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.24
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1979 1662 120.1 — — — — -29 -5 — 28.1% -1.97 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.45
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1980 1610 95.3 — — — — -77 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1744 131.4 — — — — -71 +6 — 43.4% -0.57 11–17 (39%) 10–9 (53%) 98.1 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.