H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Heidi Eisterlehner H2H: 0-1
Heidi Eisterlehner holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heidi Eisterlehner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1982 Rheda-Wiedenruck third round 7-5 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1982* | Rheda-Wiedenruck | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 7-5 6-7 6-1 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Heidi Eisterlehner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |