H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Laura Garrone H2H: 0-1
Laura Garrone holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Garrone leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Garrone won the 1986 Berlin second round 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1986* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Laura Garrone | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |