H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-2
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 6-2 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1984* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-2 6-2 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |