H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Penny Barg H2H: 0-1
Penny Barg holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Penny Barg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Penny Barg won the 1986 Boca Raton second round 7-5 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1986* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Penny Barg | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Penny Barg | — | — | — | 1,611 | 19 | 34 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Penny Barg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |