H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 0-2
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 2–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1985 Barcelona quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1985* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
| May 4, 1985* | Taranto | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |