H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 0-1
Renata Tomanova holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1981 Indianapolis third round 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1981* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |