H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Sue Barker H2H: 1-1
Katerina Bohmova and Sue Barker are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on clay, while Katerina Bohmova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Bohmova won the 1984 US Open first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Katerina Bohmova | 6-2 6-4 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1982* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sue Barker | 6-2 6-3 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |