H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 0-2
Sylvia Hanika holds a 2–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1984 US Open second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sylvia Hanika | 6-3 6-2 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1980* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sylvia Hanika | 6-2 6-2 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 |