H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 0-1
Wiltrud Probst holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1987 Hamburg third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1987* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 6-2 6-1 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |