H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Bohmova vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-2
Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1985 Australian Open third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1985* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Zina Garrison | 6-1 6-1 | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1984* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 1-2 (ret.) | Katerina Bohmova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Bohmova | #302 | #196 | 73 | 1,592 | 38 | 79 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Bohmova | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -9 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -7 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -6 | 1981 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -5 | 1982 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -4 | 1983 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1985 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |