H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katerina Maleeva vs Dianne Van Rensburg H2H: 3-0
Katerina Maleeva holds a 3–0 lead over Dianne Van Rensburg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Katerina Maleeva leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1990 Manhattan Beach third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 58
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1990* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-1 6-1 | Dianne Van Rensburg | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-2 6-3 | Dianne Van Rensburg | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-2 6-3 | Dianne Van Rensburg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Dianne Van Rensburg | — | — | — | 1,790 | 82 | 92 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Maleeva | Dianne Van Rensburg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |