H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katerina Maleeva vs Laura Garrone H2H: 1-0
Katerina Maleeva holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Garrone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katerina Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1992 Linz third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1992* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Katerina Maleeva | 6-1 6-3 | Laura Garrone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Maleeva | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |