H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Maleeva vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-0
Katerina Maleeva holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katerina Maleeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1988 Sofia third round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1988* | Sofia | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-1 7-6 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Katerina Maleeva | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |