H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katerina Maleeva vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 3-1
Katerina Maleeva holds a 3–1 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Katerina Maleeva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Leipzig third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1994* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-2 | Katerina Maleeva | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1993* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Katerina Maleeva | 6-0 6-1 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1992* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-4 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1987* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-2 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Katerina Maleeva | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |