H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Maleeva vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 2-1
Katerina Maleeva holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Katerina Maleeva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1990 Wimbledon fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Katerina Maleeva | 6-3 6-0 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1989* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 7-6 1-6 7-5 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1986* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Nathalie Herreman | 6-2 6-2 | Katerina Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Maleeva | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |