H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Katerina Maleeva vs Terry Holladay H2H: 1-0
Katerina Maleeva holds a 1–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katerina Maleeva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Katerina Maleeva | 6-1 6-2 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Maleeva | Terry Holladay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |