H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kateryna Volodko vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 0-1
Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 39
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 7-6(4) | Kateryna Volodko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateryna Volodko | #584 | #29 | 1,740 | 1,801 | 137 | 187 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kateryna Volodko | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #384 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 2007 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #44 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | 2009 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #31 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2010 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #99 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 2011 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #92 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #132 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1168 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #285 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #584 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |