H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kateryna Volodko vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 0-1
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 1–0 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2017 Miami second round 6-2 2-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 39
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 6-2 2-6 7-6(2) | Kateryna Volodko | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2017 | Sydney | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Kateryna Volodko | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateryna Volodko | #584 | #29 | 1,740 | 1,801 | 137 | 187 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kateryna Volodko | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #384 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #44 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2009 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #31 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #99 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #92 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #132 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1168 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #285 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #584 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |