H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kateryna Volodko vs Paola Suarez H2H: 0-1
Paola Suarez holds a 1–0 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paola Suarez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2006 San Diego third round 7-6(4) 2-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 39
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2006* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Paola Suarez | 7-6(4) 2-6 | Kateryna Volodko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateryna Volodko | #584 | #29 | 1,740 | 1,801 | 137 | 187 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kateryna Volodko | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #384 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #44 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #31 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #99 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #92 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #132 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1168 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #285 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #584 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |