H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kateryna Volodko vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-0
Kateryna Volodko holds a 2–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kateryna Volodko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kateryna Volodko won the 2008 Berlin second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 39
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Kateryna Volodko | 6-4 6-3 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
| May 3, 2007* | Warsaw | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Kateryna Volodko | 6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateryna Volodko | #584 | #29 | 1,740 | 1,801 | 137 | 187 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kateryna Volodko | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #384 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #44 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2009 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #31 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2010 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #99 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2011 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #92 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #132 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1168 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #285 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #584 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |