H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Kateryna Volodko vs Vania King H2H: 0-2
Vania King holds a 2–0 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Vania King leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2012 Australian Open first round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 39
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Vania King | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Kateryna Volodko | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2007* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Vania King | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Kateryna Volodko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateryna Volodko | #584 | #29 | 1,740 | 1,801 | 137 | 187 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kateryna Volodko | Vania King | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #384 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #44 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #31 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #99 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #92 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #132 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1168 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #285 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #584 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |