H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Kateryna Volodko vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-2

Kateryna Volodko and Venus Williams are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kateryna Volodko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kateryna Volodko won the 2015 Istanbul third round 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 39 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2015* Istanbul WTA 250 R32 Hard Kateryna Volodko #119 6-4 7-6(4) Venus Williams #15 Match data
Aug 20, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kateryna Volodko #64 1-6 7-5 6-4 Venus Williams #3 Match data
Jun 25, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #3 6-3 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #73 Match data
Oct 3, 2008* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #8 6-4 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,801 137 187 42.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kateryna Volodko Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,536 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,630 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2008 15–18 45.5% #62 1,646 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,769 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,665 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,719 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2012 7–11 38.9% #136 1,659 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 — — — — — — — 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,619 0 1 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,606 0 1 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,653 0 2 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2018 3–11 21.4% #132 1,568 0 2 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,537 0 2 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,510 0 2 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,530 0 2 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,550 0 2 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,541 0 2 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47