H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kateryna Volodko vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-2

Kateryna Volodko and Venus Williams are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kateryna Volodko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kateryna Volodko won the 2015 Istanbul round of 32 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kateryna Volodko #119 6-4 7-6(4) Venus Williams #15 Match data Jul 23, 2015* R32 Istanbul International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Kateryna Volodko #64 1-6 7-5 6-4 Venus Williams #3 Match data Aug 20, 2009* R32 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #3 6-3 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #73 Match data Jun 25, 2009* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Venus Williams #8 6-4 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #54 Match data Oct 3, 2008* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,802 138 190 42.1% 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kateryna Volodko Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0
18 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,535 0 0 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3
19 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9
20 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,622 0 0 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #62 1,640 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21
22 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,770 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28
23 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,666 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29
24 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,720 0 1 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31
25 2012 7–12 36.8% #136 1,656 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33
26 — — — — — — — 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33
27 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,616 0 1 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36
28 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,605 0 1 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39
29 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41
30 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,652 0 2 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43
31 2018 4–12 25.0% #132 1,587 0 2 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43
32 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,554 0 2 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44
33 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,519 0 2 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44
34 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,534 0 2 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48
36 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,553 0 2 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,543 0 2 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kateryna Volodko Venus Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2005 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
20 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2008 4 12 16 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2009 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2010 7 12 19 36.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
24 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
28 2015 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
29 2016 8 11 19 42.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
31 2018 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
36 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
37 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 84 117 201 41.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 17 19 36 47.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 282/323 of Kateryna Volodko's and 581/732 of Venus Williams's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kateryna Volodko Venus Williams
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 4/14 4.3 4.8 51.4% 66.4% 43.7% 52.6% 32.1% 55.4% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 8/15 3.0 6.1 54.5% 61.2% 47.5% 44.5% 48.0% 54.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 27/32 2.7 4.6 57.4% 63.9% 44.4% 57.8% 50.6% 55.6% 43.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 33/34 2.4 3.7 57.4% 64.2% 46.1% 49.9% 47.7% 56.6% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 41/43 2.0 3.5 63.5% 62.3% 44.6% 49.5% 49.1% 55.7% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 21/23 2.7 4.4 60.6% 59.9% 41.6% 45.5% 43.5% 52.7% 43.1% 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3%
24 2011 23/24 1.5 3.8 64.8% 62.4% 43.3% 53.4% 60.9% 56.0% 46.7% 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1%
25 2012 17/19 1.7 6.8 64.1% 61.2% 35.3% 50.6% 44.1% 51.9% 42.7% 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5%
27 2014 2/2 0.5 6.0 63.1% 68.8% 28.9% 54.5% 49.2% 53.9% 42.4% 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6%
28 2015 14/22 1.5 5.3 69.1% 62.2% 47.4% 59.2% 56.9% 57.6% 39.7% 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0%
29 2016 31/31 2.5 4.5 64.8% 62.1% 43.6% 51.6% 52.0% 55.3% 44.4% 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1%
30 2017 26/27 2.5 5.1 62.8% 62.7% 43.7% 47.0% 57.8% 55.6% 45.0% 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4%
31 2018 14/16 2.1 5.7 60.0% 60.4% 41.8% 50.4% 40.5% 53.0% 39.3% 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7%
32 2019 2/2 2.5 7.5 48.6% 58.1% 32.0% 37.5% 34.1% 44.6% 41.0% 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0%
33 2020 13/13 2.1 6.0 59.6% 64.5% 40.3% 55.8% 53.2% 54.5% 41.4% 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2%
34 2021 3/3 2.0 3.3 58.4% 51.7% 41.3% 47.5% 33.2% 47.4% 37.3% 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0%
36 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 61.7% 54.7% 35.4% 54.2% 69.0% 47.4% 38.7% 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8%
37 2024 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.3% 70.5% 65.5% 60.0% 25.0% 68.5% 31.8% 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5%
44 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9%
45 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7%
46 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0%
Career — 282/328 2.2 4.6 61.5% 62.4% 43.3% 51.1% 50.1% 55.0% 42.8% — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kateryna Volodko Venus Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31
16 2003 1493 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.13 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34
17 2004 1470 92.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0–1 — -0.06 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -1.92
18 2005 1535 114.5 -0.65 -1.39 0.888 47.3% +53 -74 — 48.4% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 +0.22 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 108.8 -0.82
19 2006 1530 109.9 -0.47 -1.41 0.933 48.7% +34 -81 — 39.4% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.19 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 105.8 -4.08
20 2007 1623 134.3 -0.20 +0.29 0.974 49.7% -9 -92 — 40.5% -0.53 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.9 -1.23 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 106.2 -2.30
21 2008 1641 129.4 +1.11 -2.53 0.922 48.7% -55 -111 +64 44.9% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.4 -0.94 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) 106.1 -1.53
22 2009 1771 139.2 +0.57 +0.61 0.989 49.9% -80 -106 -46 53.5% +0.09 8–7 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -0.90 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -2.34
23 2010 1667 123.1 -2.00 -0.23 0.911 47.7% -7 -36 — 37.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.17 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 -1.73
24 2011 1721 131.2 +0.20 +2.11 1.061 51.5% -32 -47 -19 62.0% +0.92 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -1.37 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 99.4 +0.68
25 2012 1656 118.5 -1.96 -0.33 0.888 47.3% +28 -33 +55 36.4% -0.91 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -1.12 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 -2.36
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.08
27 2014 1617 101.3 -2.50 -3.04 0.919 47.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.07 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -1.59
28 2015 1605 129.5 -0.14 -0.79 0.935 49.1% +30 -35 — 40.8% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.1 -1.36 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 -1.46
29 2016 1673 127.0 -0.24 +0.59 0.993 49.8% +20 -110 +22 44.9% -0.05 9–7 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 98.5 -1.35 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) 88.0 -2.55
30 2017 1653 121.1 -0.88 +1.50 1.012 50.3% +65 -155 — 48.3% -0.15 3–7 (30%) 2–4 (33%) 95.5 +1.05 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 +0.82
31 2018 1587 117.1 -1.92 -1.90 0.835 46.5% +93 -154 +97 34.2% -0.89 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 100.9 -0.30 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19
32 2019 1555 96.1 -2.89 -0.91 0.739 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.17 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 99.5 -1.94
33 2020 1520 114.3 -2.12 -1.71 0.910 48.5% +80 — — 38.7% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.76 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 92.5 -0.63
34 2021 1535 102.9 -0.85 -0.91 0.710 42.6% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — +0.05 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) 93.1 +0.59
35 2022 1550 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.59
36 2023 1553 107.2 -1.05 +0.97 0.736 44.2% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.28 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 95.7 +1.30
37 2024 1543 102.6 -0.34 -0.32 1.010 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.29 2017 1941 149.8 +3.49 +3.26 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) 106.7 -0.36
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.67
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 -1.42
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.8 -1.11
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 95.5 -0.01
Career — 1802 130.3 -0.44 -0.15 0.950 49.0% +5 -92 +35 44.0% -0.33 52–60 (46%) 33–52 (39%) 94.5 -1.88 — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.2 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.