H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kathleen Cummings vs Cathleen Farrell H2H: 1-0

Kathleen Cummings holds a 1–0 lead over Cathleen Farrell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathleen Cummings leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathleen Cummings won the 1980 Erie round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathleen Cummings
USA Age 65
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Cathleen Farrell
USA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathleen Cummings 6-1 6-4 Cathleen Farrell Match data Jul 31, 1980* R32 Erie WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kathleen Cummings — — — 1,681 38 50 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cathleen Farrell — — — 1,500 4 17 19.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathleen Cummings Cathleen Farrell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1980 9–3 75.0% — 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1981 4–10 28.6% — 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1982 11–8 57.9% — 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1983 2–3 40.0% — 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1984 8–13 38.1% — 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1985 4–12 25.0% — 1,504 0 0 1980 1–6 14.3% — 1,441 0 0
24 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,381 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1982 3–6 33.3% — 1,385 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kathleen Cummings Cathleen Farrell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1980 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 27 51 47.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 7 10 30.0% — 0 6 6 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kathleen Cummings Cathleen Farrell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1980 1595 117.3 — — — — +71 — — 70.4% +1.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1597 116.9 — — — — +59 -41 — 30.0% -1.47 1–1 1–1 — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1623 115.1 — — — — +7 — — 61.9% +0.83 0–4 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 91.8 +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 1644 105.3 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -2.00 1–0 2–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 1589 99.2 — — — — +27 — -48 38.0% -1.16 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 1504 99.5 — — — — +8 +26 +10 25.0% -2.09 — 0–1 — +1.87 1980 1441 89.8 — — — — +63 — — 23.1% -2.39 0–1 — — +0.14
24 1986 1491 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 1981 1381 91.0 — — — — — — — 9.1% -2.36 0–1 0–2 — +0.07
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1385 101.9 — — — — +83 +168 — 42.1% -0.21 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +1.22
Career — 1682 111.5 — — — — +31 -8 -19 43.8% -0.56 9–9 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 98.0 +6.55 — 1500 93.2 — — — — +73 +168 — 27.9% -1.42 1–4 (20%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 +7.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.