H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kathleen Harter vs Evonne Goolagong H2H: 0-2
Evonne Goolagong holds a 2–0 lead over Kathleen Harter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1975 Sydney quarterfinal 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 79
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 1975* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Evonne Goolagong | 6-0 7-5 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1971* | Christchurch Nz Chps | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Evonne Goolagong | 6-1 6-4 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Harter | — | — | — | 1,748 | 106 | 103 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathleen Harter | Evonne Goolagong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 |
| 21 | 1968 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 |
| 22 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–2 | 81.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 |
| 27 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 |
| 30 | 1977 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 |
| 31 | 1978 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 |