H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathleen Harter vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 2-0
Kathleen Harter holds a 2–0 lead over Florenta Mihai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathleen Harter leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathleen Harter won the 1977 Los Angeles third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1977* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kathleen Harter | 6-3 6-1 | Florenta Mihai | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kathleen Harter | 6-4 7-5 | Florenta Mihai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Harter | — | — | — | 1,748 | 106 | 103 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Florenta Mihai | — | — | — | 1,803 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathleen Harter | Florenta Mihai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1968 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–2 | 81.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 30–13 | 69.8% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |