H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathleen Harter vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 1-2
Ingrid Bentzer holds a 2–1 lead over Kathleen Harter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ingrid Bentzer leads 2–0 on clay, while Kathleen Harter leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ingrid Bentzer won the 1976 Bastad quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1976* | Bastad | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Ingrid Bentzer | 3-6 6-2 7-6 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1974* | Denver | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kathleen Harter | 7-6 3-6 6-2 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1970* | Bastad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Ingrid Bentzer | 8-6 6-1 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Harter | — | — | — | 1,748 | 106 | 103 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathleen Harter | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–2 | 81.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1977 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1978 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |