H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kathleen Harter vs Judy Tegart H2H: 0-5
Judy Tegart holds a 5–0 lead over Kathleen Harter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Judy Tegart leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Judy Tegart won the 1970 San Francisco fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1970* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Judy Tegart | 6-1 6-4 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1970* | Bristol | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Judy Tegart | 6-4 7-5 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1968* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Judy Tegart | 6-3 6-3 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1968* | Manchester | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Judy Tegart | 7-5 6-4 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1968* | New York | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Judy Tegart | 6-1 6-4 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Harter | — | — | — | 1,748 | 106 | 103 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Judy Tegart | — | — | — | 2,055 | 281 | 141 | 66.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathleen Harter | Judy Tegart | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–2 | 81.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 69–21 | 76.7% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1978 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 54–21 | 72.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 45–24 | 65.2% | — | 1,926 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 55–32 | 63.2% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 27–25 | 51.9% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 11 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 11 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 11 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 13 |