H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathleen Harter vs Margaret Court H2H: 0-2
Margaret Court holds a 2–0 lead over Kathleen Harter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1970 South Orange fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 79
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1970* | South Orange | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-1 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1970* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-3 6-1 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Harter | — | — | — | 1,748 | 106 | 103 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathleen Harter | Margaret Court | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–2 | 81.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 |
| 27 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 |
| 30 | 1977 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 |
| 31 | 1978 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 |