H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kathleen Harter vs Mary Ann Eisel H2H: 1-2
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 2–1 lead over Kathleen Harter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathleen Harter leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1970 Caracas semifinal 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1970* | Caracas | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-1 6-1 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1968* | Baltimore | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-2 7-5 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Mar 30, 1968* | New York | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kathleen Harter | 6-4 6-1 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Harter | — | — | — | 1,748 | 106 | 103 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathleen Harter | Mary Ann Eisel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–2 | 81.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1977 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |