H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathleen Harter vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-3
Nancy Richey holds a 3–0 lead over Kathleen Harter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1976 US Open first round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 79
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1976* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-3 7-6 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1968* | Milwaukee | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Nancy Richey | 7-5 6-2 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1968* | San Juan | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-4 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Harter | — | — | — | 1,748 | 106 | 103 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathleen Harter | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–2 | 81.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | 1977 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | 1978 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |