H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kathleen Harter vs Nell Truman H2H: 2-1
Kathleen Harter holds a 2–1 lead over Nell Truman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathleen Harter leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Nell Truman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathleen Harter won the 1970 San Francisco third round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1970* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kathleen Harter | 7-6 6-1 | Nell Truman | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1970* | Pompano Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nell Truman | 9-7 1-6 6-2 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1969* | Port Elizabeth | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Kathleen Harter | 3-6 6-1 10-8 | Nell Truman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Harter | — | — | — | 1,748 | 106 | 103 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nell Truman | — | — | — | 1,763 | 112 | 106 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathleen Harter | Nell Truman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–2 | 81.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 26–31 | 45.6% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |