H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kathleen Harter vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 2-2

Kathleen Harter and Pam Teeguarden are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1977 Indianapolis round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathleen Harter
USA Age 79
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Teeguarden 6-1 6-2 Kathleen Harter Match data Aug 12, 1977* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Pam Teeguarden 6-1 6-4 Kathleen Harter Match data Sep 8, 1970* R32 US Open Grand Slam Grass
Kathleen Harter 6-8 6-2 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Mar 21, 1970* QF Barranquilla WTA 250 Grass
Kathleen Harter 6-1 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 21, 1968* QF Pacific Southwest Championships WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kathleen Harter — — — 1,746 106 103 50.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathleen Harter Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 1968 40–22 64.5% — 1,690 0 0 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 1969 1–1 50.0% — 1,685 0 0 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 1970 23–20 53.5% — 1,678 0 0 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 1971 9–2 81.8% — 1,732 0 2 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
27 1974 4–5 44.4% — 1,729 0 2 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
28 1975 6–8 42.9% — 1,664 0 2 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
29 1976 9–16 36.0% — 1,615 0 2 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
30 1977 12–20 37.5% — 1,644 0 2 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
31 1978 2–9 18.2% — 1,591 0 2 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kathleen Harter Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1968 12 5 17 70.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 1969 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1970 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1971 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1975 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 1978 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 25 20 45 55.6% 25 31 56 44.6% 46 35 81 56.8% 6 12 18 33.3% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kathleen Harter Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 1968 1691 124.1 — — — — +5 -60 +10 63.4% +1.09 6–5 (55%) — — 0.00 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
22 1969 1686 102.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 — — +0.23 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
23 1970 1678 122.9 — — — — +41 -69 +30 53.1% +0.10 5–7 (42%) 2–0 — +0.91 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
24 1971 1732 126.5 — — — — — — +71 79.2% +2.54 1–1 — — +2.89 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
27 1974 1729 112.1 — — — — -17 — — 42.1% -1.16 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.51 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
28 1975 1665 112.0 — — — — — — +97 44.1% -0.82 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.39 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
29 1976 1615 122.9 — — — — +60 -57 +152 41.7% -0.45 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.7 +0.03 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
30 1977 1644 127.2 — — — — +49 -96 +72 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 2–4 (33%) 101.5 +0.34 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
31 1978 1592 110.8 — — — — +42 — +109 24.0% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 95.6 -0.07 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
Career — 1746 127.1 — — — — +25 -67 +57 50.6% +0.08 26–30 (46%) 11–15 (42%) 95.9 +2.03 — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.