H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kathleen Harter vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 2-2
Kathleen Harter and Pam Teeguarden are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1977 Indianapolis third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 79
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1977* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Pam Teeguarden | 6-1 6-2 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Sep 8, 1970* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Pam Teeguarden | 6-1 6-4 | Kathleen Harter | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1970* | Barranquilla | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Kathleen Harter | 6-8 6-2 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1968* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Kathleen Harter | 6-1 6-2 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Harter | — | — | — | 1,748 | 106 | 103 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,926 | 245 | 296 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kathleen Harter | Pam Teeguarden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1968 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 21–22 | 48.8% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–2 | 81.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1977 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1978 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 4 |